Safety of Outpatient Plastic Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Patient, Procedure, and Facility Characteristics Using the TOPS Registry with 286,826 Procedures.

Background: Outpatient plastic surgery at office-based surgery facilities (OBSFs) and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) has become increasingly prevalent over the past 30 years. Importantly, historical data are inconsistent regarding the safety outcomes of these venues, with advocates for both citing supporting studies. This investigation's purpose is to provide a more definitive comparative evaluation of outcomes and safety for outpatient surgery done in these facilities. Methods: The most common outpatient procedures were identified using the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) Database between 2008 and 2016. Outcomes were analyzed for OBSFs and ASCs. Patient and perioperative information was also analyzed using regression analysis to identify risk factors for complications. Results: A total of 286,826 procedures were evaluated, of which 43.8% were performed at ASCs and 56.2% at OBSFs. Most patients were healthy, middle-aged women categorized as ASA class I. The incidence of adverse events was 5.7%, and most commonly included antibiotic requirement (1.4%), dehiscence (1.3%), or seroma requiring drainage (1.1%). Overall, there was no significant difference in adverse events between ASCs or OBSFs. Age, ASA class, BMI, diabetes, smoking history, general anesthesia, CRNA involvement, operative duration, non-cosmetic indications, and body region were associated with adverse events. Conclusions: This study provides an extensive analysis of common plastic surgery procedures performed in an outpatient setting in a representative population. With appropriate patient selection, procedures are safely performed by board-certified plastic surgeons in ambulatory surgery centers and office-based settings, as evidenced by the low incidence of complications in both environments.