Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Patients Treated With Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience

We retrospectively collected baseline, perioperative and follow up data regarding RAPN and MWA from a single academic center. MWA carried a lower burden for the patient in terms of length of stay and medical complications, though it resulted in a higher rate of recurrence. Renal function variation was comparable after the two procedures. Background: Robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and microwave ablation (MWA) are 2 of the most advanced techniques for the management of localized small renal masses. Purpose: To compare the perioperative, functional and oncological results of RAPN and MWA. Materials and Methods: Data from 171 consecutive patients undergoing either RAPN or MWA for a localized small renal mass at a single academic center was retrospectively collected. Baseline features included patients' demographics and masses' characteristics. Procedures were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function variation Progression of a persistent lesion or local recurrence after a complete treatment defined local tumor progression. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis tested the association between predictors and local tumor progression. Results: Of all, 109 and 62 patients underwent RAPN and MWA. Patients in the MWA group were older ( P = .002) had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ( P < .001) and higher frequency of preoperative chronic kidney disease ( P < .001). MWA led to a shorter postoperative hospitalization time ( P < .001) and lower incidence of medical complications (6.5% vs. 22.9%, P = .02) than RAPN. GFR decline was similar between groups both at discharge ( P = .39) and at the time of last follow up ( P = 1.00). A lower rate of secondary interventions (11.7% vs. 2.8%, P = .037) and a better disease-free survival (83.2% vs. 96.5%, P = .027) were reported after RAPN. Conversely, cancer specific and overall survival were comparable ( P > .05). At univariate regression analysis, MWA was associated with local tumor progression (HR 3.46, P = .040). Conclusion: MWA displayed a lower perioperative impact, while functional outcomes were similar after each intervention. RAPN resulted superior in terms of tumor eradication, but no difference was noted regarding cancer specific survival. Thus, MWA represents a valid alternative in frail patients, though less radical than RAPN.