Acute Covid-19 Diagnosis Is Associated With Greater Submaximal Ventilation In Runners

MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE(2023)

Cited 0|Views3
No score
Abstract
COVID-19 remains an emerging clinical problem with a paucity of data describing its acute physiological effects, particularly in athletic populations. As COVID-19 largely impacts the cardiovascular system via respiratory dysfunction, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is useful to measure performance outcomes. However, acute CPET data on runners following a diagnosis is scarce. PURPOSE: Determine if CPET measures are influenced by recent COVID-19 diagnosis in runners compared to healthy controls. METHODS: 48 (24f/24 m) runners who performed maximal graded CPET following a recent COVID-19 diagnosis (<3 months) were selected from a lager cohort in an ongoing study. Control-matched athletes with no history of COVID-19 diagnosis from the cohort were also included (n = 48; 24f/24 m). No demographic differences (p > 0.05) existed between CONTROL (CN) and COVID (COV) groups, (age = CN: 36.9 ± 11, COV: 36.3 ± 11; weight (kg) = 69.1 ± 11, 70.8 ± 15; race pace (min/mile) = 8:25, 8:03). CPET protocol selection was based on participants’ self-selected half-marathon race pace (RP) with 1 kph speed increments every 3 minutes until volitional fatigue. Submaximal/threshold data were recorded at RP, 1 kph slower, and 1 kph faster. Subsequent CPET data were analyzed using two-tailed paired T-tests: VO2max, anaerobic threshold (AT), maximal/submaximal ventilation (VE), and ventilatory efficiency slope at AT (VE/VCO2). RESULTS: Mean time between COVID-19 diagnosis and in-lab testing was 51 ± 24 days. Submax VE was higher in the COV group when compared to CN at each submax speed (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.01, respectively). Despite disparities in VE, no differences in ventilatory efficiency at AT or peak VE were found between groups (VE/VCO2: CN: 27.3 ± 4, COV: 27.7 ± 3, p = 0.6; VE at peak: 119.6 ± 2, 125.8 ± 32, p = 0.06). Compared with CN runners, COV was not statistically different at peak exercise and AT (VO2max: CN: 50.2 ± 8, COV: 48.9 ± 8, p = 0.25; AT: CN: 34 ± 6, COV: 33.1 ± 6, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Post-COVID-19 runners, compared to healthy controls, exhibited an exaggerated hyperventilation response during submaximal running without a reduced peak exercise capacity. Funding source: This study received funding from Apple Inc. The funding source had no role in the analysis and interpretation of the data or in the submission of this abstract.
More
Translated text
Key words
greater submaximal ventilation
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined