Exth-56. csf penetration comparison of two oral formulations of apl-101 in a pre-clinical non-human primate model

Abstract Vebreltinib (APL-101) is a potent c-Met inhibitor which has shown efficacy in murine pre-clinical models and is under clinical trial evaluation for several cancer types, including adult high-grade glioma. The capsule formulation (APL-101-Cap) was reformulated as a pill (APL-101-Pill) with the expectation of increasing bioavailability. We determined and compared the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of APL-101-Cap and APL-101-Pill in a non-human primate (NHP) model. METHODS: Seven animals, previously developed as serial CSF access models, were utilized across all studies. One NHP was studied with both formulations. Both formulations were administered orally as a single drug/single dose in serial studies, followed by serial plasma and CSF sample collections from 0-96 hours. Dosages: APL-101-Cap 3.25 mg/kg (n = 3) or 6.5 mg/kg (n = 4) and APL-101-Pill 5 mg/kg (n = 4). The resulting plasma concentrations from each formulation were quantified by LC-MS/MS. PK parameters were calculated via noncompartmental methods, and results were analyzed to assess CNS penetration (AUCCSF:AUCPlasma) and compare formulations. RESULTS: Mean (range) for plasma and CSF PK exposure [AUCLAST (hr*ng/mL)] reported. APL-101-Cap plasma exposure, regardless of dose, was more variable than APL-101-Pill. APL-101-Pill had lower exposure in both plasma (AUC 1893.0 (841-2865)] and CSF [AUC 27.7 (5.0-65.0)] than APL-101-Cap regardless of dose [(3.25 mg/kg): plasma AUC 9621.0 (1331-23132) and CSF AUC 688.0 (24-1352); 6.5 mg/kg: plasma AUC 6208.0 (1424-19800) and CSF AUC 606.0 (34-1179)]. CNS penetrance was higher with APL-101-Cap (3.2% [0.5-5.8%] at 3.25mg/kg; 4.2% (2.4-6%) at 6.5 mg/kg), but also more variable when compared to APL-101-Pill (1.2% [0.6-2.3%]). For APL-101-Cap, one animal at 3.25 mg/kg and two animals at 6.25 mg/kg had undetectable CSF concentrations. CONCLUSION: In this NHP model, single-dose oral administration of APL-101-Pill resulted in lower, but less variable plasma and CSF exposure compared to APL-101-Cap. APL-101-Cap CSF exposure was unaffected by dose escalation.