The Minimal Utility of Analyzing Ureteropelvic Junction Tissue at the Time of Pyeloplasty

Introduction: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction is a common cause of upper tract obstruction that often necessitates surgical intervention because of its severe implications. A high proportion of these surgeries include pathologic analysis of this tissue with unclear clinical value. We examined our institution's practices concerning sending the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) specimens for pathology analysis, its clinical value, and the associated costs for both pediatric and adult cases. Methods: We performed retrospective chart review using Current Procedural Terminology codes for pyeloplasty over 8 years. Clinical variables were extracted from operative reports, path reports, and postoperative clinic notes. Pathology results were classified dichotomously as “benign” or “malignant” and subsequently assigned to 1 of 4 categories—inflammation, fibrosis, muscular hyperplasia, or no atypical findings. Results: Two hundred sixty-nine pyeloplasty surgeries were included, 68% of which were in children. Pathologic analysis was requested in most of the cases (91%), and this was slightly more common in adults (94%) than in pediatric patients (90%). All available pathology reports found benign findings in the UPJ specimen, mostly commonly categorized as “normal.” No cases of malignancy were noted. At the list price for pathologic analysis, $103,027 was spent over 8 years without the discovery of clinically significant pathology findings. Conclusions: There was a lack of clinically meaningful results from pathologic analysis of UPJ specimens excised during pyeloplasty. A UPJ specimen should not be routinely sent for pathologic analysis rather selectively if there is clinical concern for nonbenign etiology of UPJ obstruction.