Experience of implementation of regulatory impact analysis in individual post-soviet countries

Objective. The aim of the article is to study the experience of implementing such an instrument of regulatory policy as the regulatory impact analysis of regulations in some post-Soviet countries. Methodology. To achieve this goal used a wide range of general and special methods of scientific knowledge: comparative analysis, system-structural, generalization. Findings. Based on the assessment of the experience of implementing the regulatory impact analysis of individual post-Soviet countries, the peculiarities of the process of their implementation in Armenia and Uzbekistan are revealed. The structural elements of regulatory impact analysis are singled out: the purpose of regulatory impact analysis; characteristics of the formation of regulatory impact analysis; determination of the subject or area of the regulatory legal act; identification of institutions dealing with regulatory impact analysis; review of regulatory impact analysis tools; disclosure of methodological features and sources of information. Applicability. The assessment of the experience of implementing the regulatory impact analysis of individual post-Soviet countries was carried out on the basis of selected structural elements of the regulatory impact analysis, which allowed to compare the experience of Armenia and Uzbekistan. Effective tools and positive regulatory legal norms that can be applied in Ukraine are selected. The study of the experience of other countries allowed us to see some methodological and practical issues in the regulatory documents on the regulatory policy of Ukraine and the implementation of regulatory impact analysis, in particular. This article is part of a comprehensive research to improve the regulatory impact analysis in Ukraine based on the identification of best international experience. The finding specified display traits of significant novelty.