Applications of radiogenic and transition metal isotopes to the study of metallic mineral deposits

This chapter discusses how radiogenic and stable isotopes can be used in the study of metallic mineral deposits. Although the chapter is mostly focused on the radiogenic (Pb, Os) and heavy stable (Fe, Cu, Zn) isotopes of metallic elements, we complement the discussion highlighting also the power of stable isotopes of light elements, which are major to significant components of hydrothermal fluids and rocks (e.g., H, B, C, N, O, S), as well as of radiogenic isotopes of elements (Sr, Nd, Hf) that are useful in tracing fluid/magma sources and their interaction with the host rocks. In the first part of this chapter we discuss general aspects of isotopes clarifying the differences between stable non-radiogenic and stable radiogenic isotopes and, consequently, their different applicability to metallogenic studies. Due to their properties, stable non-radiogenic isotopes record mass-dependent fractionation that occur in many reactions associated with the formation of mineral deposits. Mass-dependent fractionation of stable non-radiogenic isotopes occurs both under equilibrium and non-equilibrium (kinetic) conditions of the reactions leading to ore mineral deposition and is controlled by various physico-chemical parameters, like, among the principal ones, temperature, oxygen fugacity, and biological activity. Therefore, stable non-radiogenic isotopes can inform us about the physico-chemical and, eventually, biological processes that control ore mineral deposition and also on the sources of some metals (e.g., transition metal isotopes of elements like Fe, Cu, Zn) or of the fluids (e.g., H, C, O, N, S isotopes) and even of metal ligands (e.g., S, Cl). We conclude the first part of the chapter providing some hints on the strategy of sampling and on the instrumentation related to isotopic studies. In the second part we discuss radioactive-radiogenic isotope systems and their applications in metallogenic studies of metallic mineral deposits. Stable radiogenic isotopes are characterized by relative variations that are controlled, in each geological system, by the addition of a radiogenic component of an isotope, derived from the decay of a radioactive parent, to the same radiogenic isotope already present in the Earth since its formation ∼4.55 Gyr ago. This relative variation is usually expressed as the ratio of a radiogenic isotope of an element to a non-radiogenic isotope of the same element. The ratio of these two isotopes has increased since the Earth formation and the magnitude of its variations depends on the radioactive/radiogenic isotope ratios in different geological systems and on the time elapsed since the system has formed. The Earth is ∼4.55 Gyr old and has evolved from an initially homogeneous isotopic composition to reservoirs (e.g., mantle, crust) and crustal rocks with very variable radioactive/radiogenic isotope ratios due to magmatic, metamorphic, weathering, atmospheric and biologic processes, among others. This has resulted in extremely large variations of radiogenic isotopes in rocks and reservoirs of the Earth which can track various geological processes. In ore geology, stable radiogenic isotopes are best suited for tracing metal (e.g., Pb, Os) sources from different rocks and reservoirs (e.g., mantle, upper crust, lower crust), fluid-rock interactions (i.e., the hydrothermal plumbing system), or magma-host rock interactions (e.g., host rock assimilation by magmas associated with magmatic-hydrothermal deposits). Radioactive-radiogenic isotope systems allow us to determine also absolute ages of suitable minerals that are found in mineral deposits. This is an essential information in metallogeny that allows us to link the formation of a mineral deposit to a specific geological process and/or to specific periods of the Earth's history. We discuss various dating methods that are extensively applied to date mineral deposits. These methods can be subdivided into those that allow a direct dating of ore minerals (e.g., ReOs dating of molybdenite, UPb dating of cassiterite) and those that allow dating of minerals that are demonstrably related with the mineralization (e.g., UPb dating of zircon from magmatic rocks associated with magmatic-hydrothermal deposits; Ar/Ar dating of K-bearing minerals resulting from alteration associated with various types of mineral deposits). We discuss pros and cons of using these various methods and also mention methods that are less used (because potentially less accurate and precise), but sometimes represent the only possibility to provide an age to deposit types that are notoriously difficult to date (e.g., MVT and Carlin-type deposits). We highlight the power of both stable radiogenic and non-radiogenic isotopes in unravelling the genesis of metallic mineral deposits through a series of conceptual and real examples applied to a broad range of mineral deposit types such as porphyry systems (i.e., porphyry deposits, high- and intermediate-sulfidation epithermal deposits, skarn, carbonate replacement deposits, sediment-hosted Au deposits), low-sulfidation epithermal deposits, IOCG deposits, ortho-magmatic deposits, volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits (VHMS), sediment-hosted deposits (stratiform copper, MVT), and supergene deposits. In the third part of the chapter, we discuss the use of transition metal stable non-radiogenic isotopes to mineral deposits. Although in its infancy, the application of transition metal isotopes to mineral deposit investigation is quickly growing because these isotopes allow us to address different aspects of the formation of mineral deposits compared to radiogenic isotopes. In particular, isotopes of transition metals (like stable isotopes of light elements) undergo mass-dependent fractionation processes that may be associated with different types of equilibrium and non-equilibrium chemical, physical and biological reactions occurring during the formation of mineral deposits. We focus on the applications of the isotopes of Cu, Fe and Zn to various deposit types, because isotopes of these transition metals are those that have been most extensively used in mineral deposit studies. Mass-independent fractionation may also occur for isotopes of some elements and could be a developing field that has not yet been extensively explored in the study of mineral deposits.