Clinical guidelines recommending prosthetics and orthotics in Sweden: Agreement between national and regional guidelines

Background: Despite the presence of both national and regional clinical practical guidelines (CPGs) in Sweden, no previous studies have investigated the quality of CPGs or the level of agreement between national and regional CPGs. Objective(s): This study aimed to assess the quality of national CPGs recommending prosthetics and orthotics (P&O) and quantify the agreement between national and regional CPGs in Sweden. Study design: Literature Review. Methods: National and regional CPGs were identified in public databases and by surveyed local nurse practitioners. Quality of the national guidelines was assessed by using AGREE II. Agreement between recommendations in the national and regional CPGs was quantified on a 4-grade rating scale (“similar,” “partially similar,” “not similar/not present,” and “different”). Results: Of 18 national CPGs, 3 CPGs (CPGs of Diabetes, Musculoskeletal disorders, and Stroke) had 9 recommendations related to P&O. The Musculoskeletal disorders and Stroke CPGs had quality scores .60% in all domains, and the Diabetes CPG had scores .60% in 5 of 6 domains according to AGREE II. Seven regional CPGs for P&O treatment were identified. Three national recommendations (in Diabetes CPGs) showed “similar” content for all regions, and 2 national recommendations (in Diabetes CPGs) showed “not similar” content for all regions. The remaining recommendations (Diabetes, Musculoskeletal disorders, and Stroke CPGs) had varying agreement with regional CPGs. Conclusions: There is a limited number of national recommendations for treatment within P&O. There was variation in the agreement of P&O–related recommendations in national and regional CPGs, which might lead to unequal care throughout the national healthcare system.