A Quantitative Model that Incorporates Reactive Inhibition but No Micro-Consolidation Explains Motor Sequence Practice Effects

Abstract Several recent papers have advanced the hypothesis that motor sequence learning occurs exclusively during short breaks between performance trials, a process known as micro-consolidation. T. Here, we advance an alternative hypothesis in which motor learning happens concurrently with performance and that reactive inhibition – which has a progressive slowing effect on performance during each trial but dissipates during breaks – operates with equivalent magnitude within each training trial, yielding the illusion that learning occurs during breaks across the range of early training trials on which analyses were conducted in the recent studies. We advance a quantitative model of motor sequence practice effects that embodies our assumptions and provides a close fit to data at the grain-size of sequences within trials. Our modeling approach allows for a level of predictive precision and theoretical transparency that in our view should be the standard in future work on this topic.