Contributions of macrostructural and microstructural white matter damage to apathy in people with Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background Apathy is the most common neuropsychiatric symptom in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that affects patients’ quality of life and prognosis. Previous functional neuroimaging studies have found multiple cerebral alterations suggesting a conceptualisation of apathy as a symptom resulting from a communication breakdown among functional neural networks involved in motivational‐affective processing. To test this hypothesis, this study investigated the association between white matter (WM) structural connectivity and apathy in AD. Method Sixty‐one patients with (AD‐AP) and 61 without apathy (AD‐NA) were identified from the ADNI database and matched for diagnosis, cognitive status, age and education. A group of 61 matched healthy older adults (HOA) was also included. Data on cognitive performance, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, brain volumes and mean DTI indices of 50 WM tracts were extracted for all participants. Cognitive profiles and volumetric/DTI data were compared across groups using general linear models including sex as a covariate. Post hoc analyses were performed to investigate pair‐wise differences in all outcome measures. Result Both patient groups showed widespread cognitive deficits and neural alterations, lower amyloid beta and higher phosphorylated tau CSF levels compared to the HOA group. The direct AD‐AP vs AD‐NA comparison showed no significant differences in CSF biomarkers and MRI outcomes, but the AD‐AP group had more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms, lower scores on the Clock Test – copy and relied more on cues in the Logical Memory test – delayed recall. When the patient groups were compared to the HOA independently, the AD‐AP group had more extensive WM damage: 1) reduced WM and larger WM hyperintensity volume; 2) increased radial diffusivity and reduced fractional anisotropy primarily in the cingulum, superior longitudinal and inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculi and genu of the corpus callosum. Conclusion AD‐AP patients had WM damage mildly more severe than that observed in AD‐NA, especially in associative tracts in the frontal lobes and the cingulum. Such disruption in structural connectivity might affect crucial functional inter‐network communication resulting in motivational deficits and worse cognitive decline. These findings warrant further investigations to ascertain the relationship between WM damage and disruption of functional brain network dynamic interactions in AD patients with apathy.