Use of modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS‐M) for cognitive impairment analysis one year after COVID‐19 hospitalization in Brazil

Abstract Background COVID‐19 infection primarily affects the respiratory system despite of short and medium‐term cognitive impairment has been increasingly reported. The Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS‐M), validated for cognitive screening after stroke, assesses domains such as orientation, attention/calculation, language, and immediate and delayed episodic memory. Thus, the TICS‐M might be useful to remotely screen for cognitive impairment in individuals affected by COVID‐19. Method Cross‐sectional multicenter study in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, with participants hospitalized with COVID‐19 confirmed by RT‐PCR or serology. All patients were aged 18+ years. Clinical and sociodemographic data were obtained through electronic medical records and/or interviews. Cognitive impairment screening was performed one year after hospital admission using the TICS‐M, with a cutoff point of 14 out of 39. Result Ninety‐six patients were submitted to the test, of which 50 (52.1%) were women, 72 (75%) were self‐declared non‐white, 59 (64.15%) did not complete elementary school and the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 49‐69). There was no significant association between lower TICS‐M scores and sociodemographic data or previous medical history, except for higher educational level that appears to be a protective factor to lower scores on TICS‐M (OR 0.089, 95% CI:0,01‐0,7, p 0.008), which is demonstrated in Table 1. There was also no association between the scores and the clinical course during hospitalization as displayed in Table 2. Furthermore, length of hospital stay (p = 0.232) and length of stay in Intensive Care Unit (p = 0.565) did not impact the scores. Conclusion In this study, 15% of the sample had cognitive impairment one year after hospitalization for COVID‐19 according to TICS‐M. The absence of an association between known risk factors for cognitive deficits and worse scores on the TICS‐M might have been influenced by the fact that only 13.5% of our sample did not have comorbidities. Lower education level was the only factor associated with worse scores, which indicates a possible need to adapt the test or the cutoff point for different educational levels.