Geometric Thickness of Multigraphs is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete

Henry Förster,Philipp Kindermann, Tillmann Miltzow,Irene Parada, Soeren Terziadis,Birgit Vogtenhuber

Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics(2023)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
We say that a (multi)graph $G = (V,E)$ has geometric thickness $t$ if there exists a straight-line drawing $\varphi : V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ and a $t$-coloring of its edges where no two edges sharing a point in their relative interior have the same color. The Geometric Thickness problem asks whether a given multigraph has geometric thickness at most $t$. This problem was shown to be NP-hard for $t=2$ [Durocher, Gethner, and Mondal, CG 2016]. In this paper, we settle the computational complexity of Geometric Thickness by showing that it is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete already for thickness $57$. Moreover, our reduction shows that the problem is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete for $8280$-planar graphs, where a graph is $k$-planar if it admits a topological drawing with at most $k$ crossings per edge. In the course of our paper, we answer previous questions on the geometric thickness and on other related problems, in particular, that simultaneous graph embeddings of $58$ edge-disjoint graphs and pseudo-segment stretchability with chromatic number $57$ are $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要