Polymers of low concern? Assessment of microplastic particles used in 3D printing regarding their toxicity on Raphidocelis subcapitata and Daphnia magna

The potential effects of microplastic particle exposure on environmental organisms has sparked intense research activities. Various studies have been conducted, however on a limited set of mostly pristine polymer materials. In parallel to the ongoing research activities, it is discussed to include non-natural polymers into the registration process under REACH. Currently, non-natural polymers are exempted from registration, based on the general assumption of being non-hazardous due to their high molecular weight. In addition, the extensive number of polymers exceeding the registration capacities was mentioned as a reason for exemption. Hence, relevant polymers requiring a registration shall be selected according to specific criteria that help to identify those with a concern for hazardous effects. In the line of these developments we here present the results of a systematic ecotoxicity testing of 16 microplastic particles of different polymer composition, part of which are micronized polymer powders used in 3D printing (intentionally produced primary microplastic, losing particle shape by the 3D printing). All polymer materials were systematically varied and extensively characterised with regard to their properties (e.g. particle size, cross-linking, molar mass distribution, end groups, reactivity). Most of the polymers exerted toxicity in 48 h acute Daphnia magna immobilisation assay and 72 h chronic Raphidocelis subcapitata growth inhibition assay, except one PA and one HDPE material showing toxicity in D. magna , and one HDPE material showing toxicity in green algae. From these results we conclude that none of the microplastic particles studied here, independent of their polymer properties, give raise to concern for hazardous effects.