Differences in the purpose of exercise between hemodialysis patients who continued or dropped out of exercise programs: a multicenter cohort study

Background Selecting suitable exercise goals is crucial for fostering adherence to, and maintenance of, exercise therapy. We aimed to evaluate the variance in exercise objectives between individuals who continued and those who dropped out of a 6-month intradialytic exercise program by analyzing an open-ended questionnaire administered to patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods The study consisted of outpatients ( n = 541; mean age, 70 years) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, who had been informed of an intradialytic exercise program and voluntarily agreed to participate. The primary outcome was the exercise purpose. The difference in exercise purpose was quantitatively analyzed between the exercise continuation and dropout groups. A co-occurrence network was created and concepts were constructed. The basic attributes were compared using chi-squared and independent t-tests. Results Over 6 months, 154 patients (28.5%) dropped out of the intradialytic exercise program. Concepts related to the goals of the program were: (1) physical function and condition, (2) addressing limitations, (3) maintaining daily life activities, and (4) physical condition recognition. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the exercise continuation group established their objectives based on the health benefits of exercise, and proactively set goals rooted in comprehending their current issues and problems. The dropout group tended to perceive treatment passively as an extension of daily clinical practice, rather than actively formulating exercise objectives. Conclusion The exercise objectives of those who continued the exercise program differed from those who dropped out. Patients in the exercise continuation group set more affirmative and specific exercise objectives, whereas those in the dropout group set more passive and abstract exercise objectives. Graphical abstract