Osmotic pump with potential for bone lengthening distracts continuously in vitro and in vivo

BackgroundIn pediatric orthopedics, long bone lengthening procedures are routinely performed using manual, motorized or magnetically controlled implants. This study aims to prove expansion of a newly designed osmotic pump prior to long bone lengthening in living organisms and to rule out any complications related to in vivo conditions, such as congestion of the semipermeable membrane, local infection, or lack of water to drive the osmotic pump, as well as to compare in vivo and in vitro expansion data.MethodsOsmotic pumps, which were designed to distract a plate osteosynthesis, were inserted in the dorsal paraspinal musculature of four piglets. To compare the performance of the pumps in in vivo and in vitro conditions, another set of pumps was submerged in physiologic saline solution at different temperatures. The lengthening progress was measured radiographically and sonographically in the study animals.Results Both, in vitro and in vivo tested osmotic pumps started distraction after an intended rest phase of four days and distracted evenly over the following twelve days. No complications, clogging or damages occurred. However, we observed a temperature dependency of the distraction rate ranging from 0.98 mm/day at 39 degrees C to 1.10 mm/day at 42 degrees C. With a second setup, we confirmed that the distraction rate differed by 72% within a measured temperature interval of 14 degrees C.ConclusionsThe data presented here confirm that the novel osmotic pump showed comparable lengthening characteristics in vivo and in vitro. No complications, such as congestion of the semipermeable membrane, local infection, or lack of water to drive the osmotic pump were observed. Thus, osmotic pumps may have great potential in future applications such as long bone lengthening procedures, where continuous distraction probably provides a better bone quality than intermittent lengthening procedures. The fact that one pump failed to elongate in each condition, highlights the importance of technical improvement, but also demonstrates that this was not due to different circumstances within the in vivo or in vitro condition.