Clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization among young adults with colon cancer on Medicaid vs private insurance.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
22 Background: The incidence of colon cancer in young adults has been increasing. The role of insurance on the outcomes of young adults diagnosed with colon cancer is unclear. In this study we sought to study the impact of Private insurance vs Medicaid on the outcomes of colon cancer in young adults (<50 years). Methods: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) 2016-2019 was queried to identify young adult patients (Age <50 years) admitted for colon cancer using the ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) codes. Study population was stratified based on the insurance (private vs Medicaid). Primary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges (THC). Secondary outcomes included prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE), ICU admission, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute respiratory failure (ARF), blood transfusion, and sepsis. Statistics were performed using multivariate linear and logistic regression using STATA v17. Results: 59,065 young adult admissions were identified with a principal diagnosis of colon cancer between 2016-2019. Among them 36,765 (62.2%) were on private insurance while 13,480 (22.8%) were on Medicaid. Medicaid patients were significantly younger, female, Black and Hispanic with a higher Charlson comorbidity index (p<0.05). Of the 870 (1.5%) patients that died during the admission, 46.5% (N= 405) had private insurance whereas 26.4% (N= 230) had Medicaid. There was no significant difference in the odds of mortality between private insurance and Medicaid (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.67; p=0.77). The LOS was increased by 1.5 days for Medicaid patients compared to private insurance (95% CI 1.15-1.90; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in total hospitalization charges among both groups. Medicaid patients had higher odds of sepsis (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.09-1.94; p=0.012), requiring blood transfusion (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.32-1.83; p<0.000) and less likely to undergo colectomy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.67; p<0.000). There were no significant differences in ICU admission, AKI and ARF. Conclusions: Compared to private insurance, Medicaid patients had similar healthcare outcomes and hospital charges despite a longer LOS. In an era where the country explores options for healthcare reform including single payor system, our study provides insight into similar effectiveness of Medicaid in caring for young colon cancer patients compared to Private Insurance despite higher comorbidities in Medicaid patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
colon cancer,medicaid,private insurance,healthcare utilization
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要