P913: low-dose belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) in combination with nirogacestat vs belamaf monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (rrmm): phase 1/2 dreamm-5 platform sub-study 3

Natalie S. Callander,Paul G. Richardson, Marek Hus,Vincent Ribrag,Joaquín Martínez‐López,Kihyun Kım, Jae Hoon Lee,Meletios A. Dimopoulos,Fredrik Schjesvold,Thierry Facon,Jae‐Cheol Jo,Chang‐Ki Min, Michał Mielnik,Shinta Cheng, Matthew R. Smith,Caroline J. Breitbach, Christopher D. Brawley, Harjeet Sembhi, John LaMacchia,Sebastian Grosicki

HemaSphere(2023)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical Background: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, is being developed to address an unmet need in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). DREAMM-5 (NCT04126200) is an ongoing Phase 1/2 platform study that incorporates a master protocol evaluating multiple belamaf-containing combinations in distinct sub-studies to identify efficacious combinations. Preclinical data suggest nirogacestat, a gamma-secretase inhibitor, may enhance anti-BCMA agent activity by increasing cell-surface BCMA levels. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose belamaf + nirogacestat versus belamaf alone in triple-class refractory patients with RRMM. Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1) to belamaf 0.95 mg/kg every three weeks (Q3W, low-dose) + nirogacestat 100 mg once daily (BID) or belamaf 2.5 mg/kg Q3W monotherapy. The primary objective was to assess the clinical activity (overall response rate [ORR]) of low-dose belamaf + nirogacestat combination in comparison with the monotherapy control arm. Results: Data from 34 patients with low-dose belamaf + nirogacestat and 37 patients with belamaf monotherapy are presented. Patients had a median (range) age of 68 (48–81) years and a median (range) of 5 (3–14) prior lines of therapy. As of the data cutoff (Dec 9, 2022), patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–20) cycles of the combination and 3 (1–9) monotherapy cycles. For the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, ORR was 29% (95% CI 15.1, 47.5) and 38% (22.5, 55.2) (Table). Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events was 76% and 65%. Grade 3 ocular events were less frequent for low-dose belamaf + nirogacestat (29% vs 59%); no Grade 4 ocular events or new toxicities occurred in either arm. Four patients discontinued study treatment (combination therapy n=3; monotherapy n=1) due to adverse events unrelated to study treatment. Summary/Conclusion: Despite utilizing a belamaf dose and schedule that are expected to have limited activity as a monotherapy, low-dose belamaf + nirogacestat demonstrated an encouraging ORR with a substantial reduction of high-grade ocular events, indicating an increase in BCMA target density by nirogacestat. Furthermore, the efficacy and safety data from the monotherapy arm were consistent with DREAMM-2, DREAMM-3, and real-world evidence observed to date. These data support ongoing exploration in DREAMM-5 of belamaf + nirogacestat + standard of care agents in patients with RRMM. Funding: GSK (208887); drug linker technology licensed from Seagen Inc.; mAb produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa; nirogacestat is manufactured and provided by SpringWorks Therapeutics as part of a collaborative agreement with GSK.Keywords: Multiple myeloma, B-cell maturation antigen, Relapse, Phase I/II
更多
查看译文
关键词
nirogacestat vs belamaf monotherapy,relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma,multiple myeloma,low-dose,sub-study
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要