Springs Produce Favorable Morphological Outcomes Relative to H-craniectomy According to a Two-center Comparison of Matched Cases

Background: Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. Methods: Comparisons were performed using available pre- and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the two craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform two different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs (Gothenburg) and H-craniectomy (Renier’s technique; Uppsala). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index (CI), and age. CI, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of pre- and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay. Results: Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires two operations, the mean total operation time was similar for both methods. Of the three complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, two were spring-related. Importantly, the compiled analysis of changes in CI and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphological correction. Conclusions: The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in CI and total and partial ICVs over time.