P11.33.b a patient with glioblastoma and extensive extraneural metastases - does molecular biology play a crucial role?

Abstract BACKGROUND Extraneural metastases of glioblastoma (GBM) are rare, reported incidence in literature is 0.4% to 2%. There is a lack in epidemiological data, and what little exists is outdated. The most commonly reported sites of metastases are bone, lymph node and lung. There is an insufficient understanding of the biological mechanism of metastasis, nevertheless, surgical intervention and peritoneal seeding through a ventriculoperitoneal shunt have been postulated as rational routes for the tumor cells. However, reports show metastasizing GBM in patients where neither of these procedures have been performed and therefore biological aspects should be elucidated. Previously, some few genomic studies have shown high mutational burden and that some mutations are only detected in the metastases, indicating clonal evolution. Commonly TP53, TERT, PTEN and CDKN2A/B have been revealed as shared mutations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A 55-year-old man presented with approximately 2 months of progressive headache and behavioral changes. Brain MRI revealed a left temporal lesion suspicious of GBM and no extracranial metastasis was detected. The patient underwent near total surgical resection and completed Stupp protocol. Nine months later, he was admitted to the local hospital with reduced general condition, tachypneic and lower back pain, but subsequent CT of thorax and abdomen revealed multiple pathological lesions in mediastinum, bones, lung, soft tissue, and mesentery. MRI confirmed the findings and a large soft tissue lesion at the level of the 6th thoracic vertebrae, was biopsied and showed metastasis from GBM. There was also local progression of the primary tumor in the brain. Treatment strategy was changed to a combination of lomustine, vincristine and bevacizumab. It was collected blood samples from the patient in respect of circulating tumor cells. A molecular characterization of the tumor samples was performed. RESULTS The primary tumor was MGMT promotor methylated, IDH-1/-2 wildtype, had no TERT promotor mutation, TP53 wildtype and ATRX was intact. The biopsy of the paravertebral lesion showed infiltration of a low differentiated, highly cellular tumor. Immunohistochemically the tumor cells were positive for GFAP, OLIG2 and S100. The molecular features revealed no mutation in BRAF or NTRK. Interestingly, PD-L1 was extremely upregulated, may indicating a potential benefit of immune-checkpoint inhibitors for extraneural metastases. A literature survey is done to find out any risk factors for metastasis. CONCLUSION We report a rare case of GBM with extensive extraneural metastases. This underlines the importance of comparing molecular biology, localization, and other patient and tumoral factors in order to identify any specific risk factor for metastasis. In turn, helping to stratify the follow up of this subgroup in the future.