Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

The impact of the new acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) criteria on Berlin criteria ARDS patients: a multicenter cohort study

Lina Zhao,Fuhong Su, Nannan Zhang,Hening Wu,Yuehao Shen, Haiying Liu, Xuguang Li, Yun Li,Keliang Xie

BMC Medicine(2023)

Cited 0|Views3
No score
Abstract
Objective The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recently recommended changes to the criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patients with high-flow oxygen were included, however, the effect of these changes remains unclear. Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of these new criteria and to compare the outcomes of patients meeting the new ARDS criteria with those meeting the Berlin ARDS criteria. Methods This was a retrospective cohort. The patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were diagnosed with ARDS. Patients were classified as meeting Berlin criteria ARDS ( n = 4279), high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) criteria ARDS ( n = 559), or new criteria ARDS ( n = 4838). Results In comparison with HFNO criteria ARDS and new criteria ARDS, patients with Berlin criteria ARDS demonstrated lower blood oxygen levels assessed by PaO 2 /FiO 2 , SpO 2 /FiO 2 , and ROX (SpO 2 /FiO 2 /respiratory rate) ( p < 0.001); and higher severity of illness assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluations (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) ( p < 0.001), ( p < 0.001), and longer ICU and hospital stays ( p < 0.001). In comparison with the HFNO criteria, patients meeting Berlin criteria ARDS had higher hospital mortality (10.6% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.0082), 28-day mortality (10.6% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.0079), and 90-day mortality (10.7% vs. 17.1%; p = 0.0083). ARDS patients with HFNO did not have severe ARDS; Berlin criteria ARDS patients with severe ARDS had the highest mortality rate (approximately 33%). PaO 2 /FiO 2 , SpO 2 /FiO 2 , and ROX negatively correlated with the SOFA and APACHE II scores. The SOFA and APACHE II scores had high specificity and sensitivity for prognosis in patients with new criteria ARDS. Conclusion The new criteria of ARDS reduced the severity of illness, length of stay in the ICU, length of hospital stays, and overall mortality. SOFA and APACHE II scores remain important in assessing the prognosis of patients with new criteria ARDS. Trial registration Registration number: ChiCTR2200067084.
More
Translated text
Key words
Acute respiratory distress syndrome,Multicenter cohort study,ARDS criteria
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined