An Alternative Rapid Confirmation Method for Identifying Listeria monocytogenes from a Variety of 125 g Food Samples Within Two Days of a PCR Presumptive Positive

Catharine R. Carlin, Deann Akins-Lewenthal,Benjamin Bastin,Erin Crowley,Wendy Mcmahon, Bradley Ziebell

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION(2024)

Cited 0|Views3
No score
Abstract
Cultural confirmation following detection of a Listeria monocytogenespresumptive positive can take 3-7 days to finalize; this uncertainty is a point of frustration for food producers needing to make time-sensitive disposition decisions. To address the demand for shortened time-to-results, an alternative L. monocytogenes confirmation method consisting of two components, (i) a secondary screen using a different rapid method, and (ii) concurrent cultural isolation followed by next-day colony identification was evaluated. For the study, four food matrices (hot dogs, peanut butter, frozen vegetables, and multicomponent frozen meals) were inoculated with low levels (0.36-1.39 MPN/125 g) of L. monocytogenes per the AOAC guidelines for a matrix study. Analyses were performed on 125 g test portions and started with a PCR primary screen (Bio-Rad iQ-Check Listeria monocytogenes II). Next, all enriched food samples underwent a secondary screen by bioMerieux's GENE-UP LMO2 RealTime PCR and VIDAS LMX ELFA along with streaking onto RAPID'L.mono Agar. Presumptive positive L. monocytogenes colonies were identified utilizing a high throughput rapid identification method (Hygiena's BAX System L. monocytogenes Real-Time PCR assay, Neogen's ANSR isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay, and Bruker's MALDI Biotyper). Importantly, this study evaluated multiple commercially available options for the secondary screen (n = 2) and rapid identification (n = 3) to allow for easy adoption by testing laboratories. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference (p <= 0.05) between the number of L. monocytogenes-positive 125 g samples obtained by the cultural reference method and the alternative confirmation methods (regardless of which method combinations were evaluated). Additionally, this study supports that, when both the primary and secondary screen methods yield a positive result, the sample could be considered a confirmed positive for L. monocytogenes.
More
Translated text
Key words
125 g,Alternative confirmation,Fit-for-purpose,L. monocytogenes,Rapid detection,Secondary screen
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined