Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Mitigating Infection Risk in Upper Airway Stimulation

Naushin S. Ali,Thomas H. Fitzpatrick Iv, Albina S. Islam,Ryan S. Nord

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY(2024)

Cited 0|Views0
No score
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to define the incidence of infection with upper airway stimulation (UAS) devices requiring explantation in a single academic center and identify factors that may influence the risk of infection. Methods: A database of patients who underwent UAS at a single tertiary referral academic center from 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who developed surgical site infections, with and without subsequent explantation. Additional data for cases complicated by infection was extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) and included: demographic information, medical history, complications and management, and overall outcomes. In March 2021, 2 modifications to infection control protocols were implemented: double skin preparation with Betadine and chlorhexidine, and MRSA decolonization. Statistical analysis was performed to compare infectious risk before and after these protocol changes. Results: In the study period, 215 patients underwent UAS in the specified time period and 3 cases (1.4%) of postoperative infections were identified, all of which required explantation. The infection rate did not significantly change after modifications to the surgical prep protocol (P = .52). Conclusions: While no significant difference in infection risk was noted after modifying infection control protocols, additional longer-term study is warranted to elucidate effective infection reduction strategies.
More
Translated text
Key words
hypoglossal nerve stimulation,obstructive sleep apnea,upper airway stimulation,surgical site infection
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined