Prevention of Rhesus-D Alloimmunization in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: Economic Analysis of Three Management Strategies

Anti-D alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy has long been the subject of prevention with anti-D immunoglobulins during events at risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Although the efficacy of preventing anti-D alloimmunization by an injection of immunoglobulin at 28 weeks of gestation (WG) is obvious, the literature provides little evidence of the effectiveness before 12+ 6 WG and several countries have modified their recommendations. In the presumed absence of a difference in alloimmunization risk between early and late prevention, our objective was to evaluate and compare the cost of treatment for 3 alloimmunization prevention strategies in France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. This was a single-center retrospective study. Our target population included all women who received anti-D immunoglobulins (Rhophylac) in the first trimester of pregnancy before 12+ 6 WG at Nantes University Hospital in 2018 ( N = 356). Within the target population, 2 other populations were constituted based on British ( N = 145) and Dutch ( N = 142) clinical practice guidelines (CPG). These 3 populations were analyzed for the comparative cost of treatment for prevention from a health system perspective. The average cost of Rhophylac alloimmunization prevention for 1 episode was euro117.8 from a health system perspec-tive. The total cost attributed to prevention in 2018 at Nantes University Hospital ( N = 356) was euro41,931.4 according to this perspective. If the UK CPG or Dutch CPG had been applied to the Nantes target pop-ulation, a saving of around 60% would have been achieved. At the national level, the cost according to the health system perspective specifically attributable to induced abortion ( N estimated = 26,916) could represent a total cost of euro3,170,704. This study highlighted the high cost of the French prevention strategy in the first trimester of pregnancy compared with British or Dutch strategies. The modification of our practices would allow substantial financial savings to the French health system but would also avoid the nonrecommended exposure to a blood product at this term, would allow a faster medical management and a relief of the care system. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.