A Comprehensive Evaluation of National Cardiology Congresses Abstracts on the Basis of the 2016 Academic Criteria.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to describe the effects of new academic criteria established in 2016 on the abstracts of the National Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology. METHODS:The abstracts presented at 13 consecutive annual congresses were obtained. A literature search was conducted with PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases to analyze whether the abstract was published in a scientific journal. The study was divided into 2 time groups according to the new academic criteria published in 2016. Group 1 included 4828 abstracts accepted at National Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology between 2009 and 2016, while Group 2 included 2284 abstracts accepted at National Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS:A total of 7112 abstracts were accepted for the 2009-2021 National Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology meetings scientific program. The publication rate (43.2% vs. 23.9%, P < 0.001), number of authors [7(5-9) vs. 4(3-6), P < 0.001], and rate of original investigation (72.3 vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. Among the quality parameters of the journals in which the abstracts were published, the impact factor (0.59 ± 1.71 vs. 0.26 ± 1.09, P < 0.001), the rate of journals in science citation index or science citation index-expanded indexes (70.4 vs. 57.9%, P < 0.001), and the rate of the second or third-quartile class (24.2 vs. 16.1%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group 2 as compared to group 1. Being in group 1 oral presentation, original investigation, and cardiac imaging were identified as independent predictors for publication in scientific journals. CONCLUSION:This study showed that the 2016 new academic criteria negatively affected the publication processes of accepted abstracts in National Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology.