Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec in type 1 diabetes: onwards 6

D. Russell-Jones, T. Babazono, R. Cailleteau, S. Engberg, C. Irace, M. Kjaersgaard,C. Mathieu,J. Rosenstock,V. Woo,D. Klonoff

Canadian Journal of Cardiology(2023)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) vs once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) were assessed in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in a randomized, open-label, treat-to-target phase 3a trial (26-week main phase + 26-week safety extension + 5-week follow-up). Participants (n=582) were randomized 1:1 to icodec (n=290) or degludec (n=292), both in combination with insulin aspart. The primary endpoint was change in A1C from baseline (BL) to week 26, tested for non-inferiority (0.3% margin). At week 26, from BL values of 7.59% (icodec) and 7.63% (degludec), estimated mean A1C changes were –0.47% and –0.51%, respectively, confirming non-inferiority of icodec vs degludec (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: 0.05%-points [95% CI: –0.13 to 0.23]). From week 22 to week 26, percentage of time in range 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL) and time spent >10.0 mmol/L (>180 mg/dL) were not statistically significantly different between treatments, while percentage of time spent <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) was statistically significantly higher with icodec vs degludec (p=0.0014). Overall rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia (BL to week 26) was statistically significantly higher with icodec vs degludec (19.9 [icodec] vs 10.4 [degludec] events per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.5 to 2.3]; p<0.0001). The rate was also statistically significantly higher with icodec vs degludec when evaluated over 57 weeks. Estimated mean weekly basal dose was statistically significantly higher for icodec than degludec from week 24 to week 26 (170 U/week [∼24 U/day] vs 151 U/week [∼22 U/day]; estimated treatment ratio [ETR]: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.07 to 1.18]; p<0.0001), while estimated mean weekly bolus dose was statistically significantly lower (132 U/week [∼19 U/day] vs 161 U/week [∼23 U/day]; ETR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90]; p<0.0001). Similar trends in insulin doses were reported for week 50 to week 52. In adults with T1D, once-weekly icodec showed non-inferiority in A1C reduction vs degludec at week 26 with significantly higher rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia. For icodec, time spent <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and <3.9 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) was either below or close to internationally recommended targets at both time points.
更多
查看译文
关键词
insulin,diabetes,once-weekly,once-daily
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要