谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Firearm injuries treated at trauma centers in the United States

Frederick P. Rivara, Ashley B. Hink, Deborah A. Kuhls, Samantha Banks, Lauren L. Agoubi, Shelbie Kirkendoll,Alex Winchester, Christopher Hoeft, Bhavin Patel, Avery Nathens

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY(2024)

引用 0|浏览15
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND: While firearm injuries and deaths continue to be a major public health problem, the number of nonfatal firearm injuries and the characteristics of patients are not well-known. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma leveraged an existing data system to collect additional data on fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries presenting to trauma centers. This report provides an overview of this initiative and highlights the challenges associated with capturing actionable data on firearm-injured patients. METHODS: A total of 128 trauma centers that are part of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program collected data on individuals of any age arriving alive between March 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, with a firearm injury. In addition to the standard data collected for Trauma Quality Improvement Program, abstractors also extracted additional data specific to this study. We linked data from the Distressed Community Index to patient records using zip code of residence. RESULTS: A total of 17,395 patients were included, with mean (SD) age of 30.2 (13.5) years, 82.5% were male, and the majority were Black and non-Hispanic. The mean proportion of variables with missing data varied among trauma centers, with a mean of 20.7% missing data. Injuries occurred most commonly in homes (31.2%) or on the street (26.6%); 70.4% of injuries were due to assaults. Nearly one third of patients were discharged from the emergency department, 25.9% were admitted directly to the operating room, and 10.9% were admitted to the intensive care unit; 5.9% died in the emergency department, and 10.3% died overall during their course of care. Nearly two thirds of patients lived in the two highest distressed categories of communities; only 7.5% lived in the least distressed quintile. CONCLUSION: Using trauma center data can be a valuable tool to improve our knowledge of firearm injuries if clinical practices and documentation of patient risks and circumstances are standardized. Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Firearm injuries,mortality,trauma centers,social determinants
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要