Reliable Contactless Monitoring of Heart Rate, Breathing Rate and Breathing Disturbance During Sleep in Aging: A Digital Health Technology Evaluation Study

Introduction Longitudinal monitoring of vital signs provides a method for identifying changes to general health in an individual and particularly so in older adults. The nocturnal sleep period provides a convenient opportunity to assess vital signs. Contactless technologies that can be embedded into the bedroom environment are unintrusive and burdenless and have the potential to enable seamless monitoring of vital signs. To realise this potential, these technologies need to be evaluated against gold standard measures and in relevant populations. Methods We evaluated the accuracy of heart rate and breathing rate measurements of three contactless technologies (two under-mattress trackers: Withings sleep analyser (WSA) and Emfit QS (Emfit) and a bedside radar: Somnofy) in a sleep laboratory environment and assessed their potential to capture vital signs (heart rate and breathing rate) in a real-world setting. Data were collected in 35 community dwelling older adults aged between 65 and 83 years (mean ± SD: 70.8 ± 4.9; 21 men) during a one-night clinical polysomnography (PSG) in a sleep laboratory, preceded by 7 to 14 days of data collection at-home. Several of the participants had health conditions including type-2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and arthritis and ≈49% (n = 17) had moderate to severe sleep apnea while ≈29% (n = 10) had periodic leg movement disorder. The under-mattress trackers provided estimates of both heart rate and breathing rate while the bedside radar provided only breathing rate. The accuracy of the heart rate and breathing rate estimated by the devices was compared to PSG electrocardiogram (ECG) derived heart rate (beats per minute, bpm) and respiratory inductance plethysmography thorax (RIP thorax) derived breathing rate (cycles per minute, cpm). We also evaluated breathing disturbance indices of snoring and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) available from the WSA. Results All three contactless technologies provided acceptable accuracy in estimating heart rate [mean absolute error (MAE) < 2.2 bpm and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) < 5%] and breathing rate (MAE ≤ 1.6 cpm and MAPE < 12%) at 1 minute resolution. All three contactless technologies were able to capture changes in heart rate and breathing rate across the sleep period. The WSA snoring and breathing disturbance estimates were also accurate compared to PSG estimates (R-squared: WSA Snore: 0.76, p < 0.001; WSA AHI: 0.59, p < 0.001). Conclusion Contactless technologies offer an unintrusive alternative to conventional wearable technologies for reliable monitoring of heart rate, breathing rate, and sleep apnea in community dwelling older adults at scale. They enable assessment of night-to-night variation in these vital signs, which may allow the identification of acute changes in health, and longitudinal monitoring which may provide insight into health trajectories. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors declare no competing non-financial interests but the following competing financial interests: The Withings and Emfit devices used in this study were purchased from the manufacturers without any price reductions, etc. The Somnofy devices used in the study were provided by Vital Things, Norway at no cost. The manufacturers of these devices were not involved in either the design and conduct of this study, the analysis and interpretation of the data or the preparation of the manuscript. ### Funding Statement This work was supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London and the University of Surrey, Guildford United Kingdom which receives its funding from UK DRI Ltd, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The study received a favorable opinion and approval from the University of Surrey Ethics Committee (reference number: UEC 2019 065 FHMS) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Principles of Good Clinical Practice, and relevant guidelines and regulations of the University of Surrey. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes