Neuromodulation and quality of life for patient with spasticity after spinal cord injury

Rationale: Spasticity develops in 80% of spinal cord injury cases and negatively affects the patents' quality of life. The most common method of surgical treatment for severe spasticity is a long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB). Long-term spinal cord stimulation is another possible treatment technique. This paper aims to evaluate the changes in quality of life for patients with spasticity who have been treated with neuromodulation (SCS or ITB) in 12 months after the surgery, as well to compare the changes in quality of life for patients who have been treated with spinal cord stimulation and those who received long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy. Materials and methods: The influence of spasticity, experienced by the patients with a spinal cord injury, on their quality of life was analyzed before the surgery and 12 months after it. The severity of the spinal cord damage was determined with the scale of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA); spasticity was evaluated with the modified Ashworth scale, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale; pain levels were determined with visual analogue scale (VAS), anxiety and depression levels - with HADS. Functional activity of the patients was evaluated with the help of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Results: The treatment results for 33 patients (25 men and 8 women), aged from 18 to 62, are presented. After the trial stimulation, the patients were randomly assigned to either SCS or ITB group (18 and 15 people respectively). The decrease of spasticity in both experimental groups caused lower levels of pain, less functional dependency on other people, lower stress and depression rates and, as a consequence, better quality of life and social adaptation. The obtained results for SCS and ITB groups are statistically similar.