Correction to: Biomechanical analysis of different THA cementless femoral stem designs in physiological and osteoporotic bone during static loading conditions

BACKGROUND:The influence of THA stem design on periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) risk is subject of debate. This study aims to compare the effects of different cementless stem designs on stress-strain distributions in both physiological and osteoporotic femur under various loading conditions. MATERIALS:A biomechanical study using finite-element analysis was conducted. Four models were developed: three with implanted femurs and a native one chosen as control. Each model was analyzed for both healthy and osteoporotic bone. The following stem designs were examined: short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation, double-wedge stem, and anatomical standard stem. Three loading conditions were assessed: gait, sideways falling, and four-point bending. RESULTS:During gait in physiological bone, the anatomical stem and the short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation showed stress distribution similar to the native model. The double-wedge stem reduced stress in the proximal area but concentrated it in the meta-diaphysis. In osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design increased average stress by up to 10%. During sideways falling, the double-wedge stem exhibited higher stresses in osteoporotic bone. No significant differences in average stress were found in any of the studied models during four-point bending. CONCLUSION:In physiological bone, anatomical stems demonstrated stress distribution comparable to the native model. The double-wedge stem showed uneven stress distribution, which may contribute to long-term stress shielding. In the case of osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design resulted in a significant increase in average stress during both gait and sideways falling, potentially indicating a higher theoretical risk of PFF.