Can Amphotericin B-mediated effects be limited using intranasal versus intravenous route?

Therapeutic delivery(2023)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
CNS infections due to parasites often prove fatal. In part, this is due to inefficacy of drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier. Here, we tested intranasal and intravenous route and compared adverse effects of Amphotericin B administration, through blood biochemistry, liver, kidney and brain histopathological evidence of toxicities post-administration. It was observed that intranasal route limits the adverse side effects of Amphotericin B, in contrast to intravenous route. As parasites such as exhibit unequivocal affinity toward the olfactory bulb and frontal lobe in the central nervous system, intranasal administration would directly reach amoebae bypassing the blood-brain barrier selectivity and achieve the minimum inhibitory concentration at the target site.
更多
查看译文
关键词
adverse effects, Amphotericin B, blood-brain barrier, brain-eating amoebae, CNS infection, free-living amoebae, intranasal route, Naegleria fowleri, novel therapeutic delivery, primary amoebic meningoencephalitis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要