Effects of chloride salt erosion and freeze–thaw cycle on interface shear behavior between ordinary concrete and self-compacting concrete

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) has been widely used for concrete jacketing to strengthen RC structures due to its high workability, fluidity, and segregation resistance. In this study, a test was carried out to study the effects of substrate curing including chloride salt erosion and the freeze–thaw cycle on the interface shear strength between ordinary concrete and the SCC. Eighty-four Z-type specimens were designed and tested through direct shear experiments, and the influence of interface treatment (implanting steel bar and cutting groove), concrete type, and substrate curing on the interface shear strength were analyzed. Four calculation models of interface shear strength based on different codes are compared, the applicability of these models is also analyzed. The results show that: For close the substrate concrete and the SCC strength, the effect of chloride salt erosion and freeze–thaw cycle will cause a slight decrease in the interface shear strength compared with the specimen that substrate is not cured, the influence of chloride ion erosion and freeze–thaw cycle on the degeneration of interface shear strength for specimen with implanting steel bar is not more obviously than specimen with cutting groove. Any single code model can not accurately predict the interface shear strength of all specimens with different interface treatments and substrate curing. The fib model can accurately predict interface shear strength of specimens which the average compressive strength of old and new concrete is less than 40 MPa and the substrate is not cured. Whether the substrate is cured or not, EC2 and CSA A23.3–14 models can quite accurately predict the interface shear strength of specimens with an implanting steel bar, but for specimens with cutting groove, the modified AASHTO model can accurately predict the interface shear strength. Except modified AASHTO model, the factor considering the effect of interface treatment should be taken into account when using fib, EC2 and CSA A23.3–14 models to calculate the interface shear strength.