Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools.

Alexandre-Godinho Pereira, Carolina-Castro Martins, Julya-Ribeiro Campos, Sandro-Felipe-Santos Faria, Sarah-Queiroz Notaro,Tina Poklepović-Peričić, Lidiane-Cristina-Machado Costa,Fernando-Oliveira Costa,Luís-Otávio-Miranda Cota

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry（2023）

引用 0|浏览1

暂无评分

摘要

Current systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontics were classified as low or critically low methodological quality and high risk of bias. Both tools led to similar conclusions. Better adherence to established reporting guidelines and stricter research practices when conducting systematic reviews are needed. Bias, evidence-based dentistry, methods, periodontics, systematic review.

查看译文

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要