temporal inertial doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.020 Ardigo LP, humans: Physiol Scand. 1748-1716.1994.tb09692.x Nielsen AM, walk-to-run study. Gait gaitpost.2017.11.008 MY. A guideline coefficients for doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Statistical Power Lawrence Calculating and practical 2013;4:863. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 Altman DG. difference against 1995;346(8982):1085-1087. Effects of physical locomotion. Unauthenticated

Purpose: Variable-speed control in the field is challenging for motion science. Tests were performed to evaluate speed, Froude number, and oxygen consumption if these varied when using the same frequency of steps. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of auditory feedback to control variable speed on the treadmill and track during acceleration cycles around the transition speed. Methods: Twenty-four trained men participated. The protocol was based on 5 ramps of 50 seconds each around 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, and 120% of the walking-running transition speed, recording the frequency of steps with a mobile phone during the treadmill test. The tests were replicated on the track using auditory feedback. Results: When evaluating each speed of the protocols separately for the same frequency of steps, the average speed on the track was always higher on average at 54.7% compared to the laboratory (P < .050), and on the track, it was 16.2% higher than in the laboratory (P > .050). Conclusions: It cannot be considered that the same frequency of steps is equivalent to the same speed in the laboratory and on the track. These results point to the importance of reliable speed control during open field tests.