How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: A comprehensive review?

F. Panthier, S. Kutchukian, H. Ducousso, S. Doizi, C. Solano,L. Candela,M. Corrales, M. Chicaud,O. Traxer, S. Hautekeete, T. Tailly

ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment. Material and methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. Results: In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20 mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL. Conclusions: Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume. (c) 2023 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Stone diameter,Stone volume,Segmentation,Ureteroscopy,Percutaneous nephrolithotomy,Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy,Computed tomography
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要