Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting

Key Points Question Can a lung cancer screening (LCS) decision tool designed for use in a primary care clinical setting improve informed LCS decision-making? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 140 participants, no statistically significant difference in decisional conflict was found at 1 month after intervention (25.7 vs 29.9, on a scale of 0 [none] to 100 [high]). Analysis of secondary outcomes suggests that the LCS decision tool intervention improved LCS knowledge without increasing general anxiety or lung cancer worry. Meaning This patient decision aid designed for use in a primary care setting can inform future research to advance LCS shared decision-making interventions.