Performance of Off-the-Shelf Machine Learning Architectures and Biases in Detection of Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Artificial intelligence - machine learning (AI-ML) is a computational technique that has been demonstrated to be able to extract meaningful clinical information from diagnostic data that are not available using either human interpretation or more simple analysis methods. Recent developments have shown that AI-ML approaches applied to ECGs can accurately predict different patient characteristics and pathologies not detectable by expert physician readers. There is an extensive body of literature surrounding the use of AI-ML in other fields, which has given rise to an array of predefined open-source AI-ML architectures which can be translated to new problems in an “off-the-shelf” manner. Applying “off-the-shelf” AI-ML architectures to ECG-based datasets opens the door for rapid development and identification of previously unknown disease biomarkers. Despite the excellent opportunity, the ideal open-source AI-ML architecture for ECG related problems is not known. Furthermore, there has been limited investigation on how and when these AI-ML approaches fail and possible bias or disparities associated with particular network architectures. In this study, we aimed to: (1) determine if open-source, “off-the-shelf” AI-ML architectures could be trained to classify low LVEF from ECGs, (2) assess the accuracy of different AI-ML architectures compared to each other, and (3) to identify which, if any, patient characteristics are associated with poor AI-ML performance. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement Support for this research came from the Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing ([www.sci.utah.edu/cibc][1]), NIH/NIGMS grants P41 GM103545 and R24 GM136986, NIH/NIBIB grant U24EB029012, National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K23HL143156 and Award Number F30HL149327 and the Nora Eccles Harrison Foundation for Cardiovascular Research. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Utah gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data from this study is not publicly available. Data may be made available via collaboration agreement upon reasonable and approved request to the authors. [1]: http://www.sci.utah.edu/cibc