A prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre study to evaluate the clinical performance of the ColoSTAT in vitro diagnostic for the detection of biomarkers associated with colorectal cancer

Emily He,Guy A. Van Hazel,Andrew Sloss,Stephen Pianko,Gregor Brown, Philip R. Clingan,Rajvinder Singh, Ann Solterbeck, Robert Traficante,Trevor Lockett, Louise Formby-Miller,Finlay Macrae

Journal of Clinical Oncology(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
3529 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) survival rates could be improved if more cancers were detected early. The ColoSTAT blood test and algorithm combines concentrations of 5 protein biomarkers with age and sex to provide an alternative to current CRC screening methods like the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). We compared the performance of ColoSTAT to colonoscopy in detecting CRC. Methods: Patients in this Australian study were either recently diagnosed with CRC using colonoscopy and progressing to surgery or neoadjuvant treatment (Cohort 1) or had no CRC history and were scheduled for colonoscopy (Cohort 2). Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related recruitment delays, the samples from Cohort 1 were supplemented with bio-banked blood samples (BBS) from patients with clinically confirmed CRC. Patients provided a 17 mL blood sample and were followed until start of cancer treatment or colonoscopy. All blood samples were de-identified prior to testing by an independent laboratory. The primary endpoints were ColoSTAT sensitivity of ≥73% (lower 95% confidence limit [LCL] > 60%), and specificity ≥90% (LCL > 80%). Sensitivity by TNM stage was an exploratory endpoint (ACTRN12619000301167). Results: Cohort 1 enrolled 29 patients, Cohort 2 enrolled 768 patients and 192 BBS were included. Patient demographic characteristics were similar in Cohorts 1, 2 and BBS. Overall, the median age of the patients (n = 989) was 64 years (range 40 to 88) and 53.4% were female. Definitive ColoSTAT results were obtained for 22 patients in Cohort 1, 554 in Cohort 2 and 81 in BBS. Overall, the estimated sensitivity of ColoSTAT for detection of CRC compared with colonoscopy was 81.3% (95%CL 73.0%-87.4%) and estimated specificity 91.0% (95%CL 87.7%-93.5%) (Table). Conclusions: The ColoSTAT test met the primary endpoints of performance based on sensitivity and specificity in detecting CRC compared to colonoscopy. ColoSTAT sensitivity and specificity for CRC were comparable with published performance parameters for FIT which range from 74-93% (sensitivity) and 85-96% (specificity). 1 Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619000301167 . Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619000301167 . [Table: see text]
更多
查看译文
关键词
colorectal cancer,biomarkers,colostat,diagnostic,cross-sectional
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要