REFORMS: Reporting Standards for Machine Learning Based Science

Sayash Kapoor, Emily Cantrell, Kenny Peng, Thanh Hien Pham, Christopher A. Bail,Odd Erik Gundersen,Jake M. Hofman,Jessica Hullman, Michael A. Lones, Momin M. Malik,Priyanka Nanayakkara,Russell A. Poldrack,Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Michael Roberts,Matthew J. Salganik, Marta Serra-Garcia,Brandon M. Stewart, Gilles Vandewiele,Arvind Narayanan

CoRR(2023)

引用 1|浏览104
暂无评分
摘要
Machine learning (ML) methods are proliferating in scientific research. However, the adoption of these methods has been accompanied by failures of validity, reproducibility, and generalizability. These failures can hinder scientific progress, lead to false consensus around invalid claims, and undermine the credibility of ML-based science. ML methods are often applied and fail in similar ways across disciplines. Motivated by this observation, our goal is to provide clear reporting standards for ML-based science. Drawing from an extensive review of past literature, we present the REFORMS checklist ($\textbf{Re}$porting Standards $\textbf{For}$ $\textbf{M}$achine Learning Based $\textbf{S}$cience). It consists of 32 questions and a paired set of guidelines. REFORMS was developed based on a consensus of 19 researchers across computer science, data science, mathematics, social sciences, and biomedical sciences. REFORMS can serve as a resource for researchers when designing and implementing a study, for referees when reviewing papers, and for journals when enforcing standards for transparency and reproducibility.
更多
查看译文
关键词
machine learning,standards,science
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要