East Asians’ T -scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis should be calculated using ethnicity- and gender-specific BMD reference ranges: justifications

The 2013 ISCD consensus recommended a Caucasian female reference database for T -score calculation in men, which says “A uniform Caucasian (non-race adjusted) female reference database should be used to calculate T-scores for men of all ethnic groups.” However, this statement was recommended for the US population, and no position was taken with respect to BMD reference data or ethnicity matching outside of the USA. In East Asia, currently, a Japanese BMD reference database is universally adopted in Japan for clinical DXA diagnosis, while both local BMD and Caucasian BMD reference databases are in use in Mainland China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. In this article, we argue that an ethnicity- and gender-specific BMD database should be used for T -score calculations for East Asians, and we list the justifications why we advocate so. Use of a Caucasian BMD reference database leads to systematically lower T -scores for East Asians and an overestimation of the prevalence of osteoporosis. Using a female BMD reference database to calculate T -scores for male patients leads to higher T -score values and an underestimation of the prevalence of osteoporosis. Epidemiological evidence does not support using a female BMD reference database to calculate T -scores for men. We also note that BMD reference databases collected in Asia should be critically evaluated for their quality.