Prognostic Significance of Primary Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Contemporary Melanoma Cohort

Background The prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on outcomes and treatment efficacy for patients with melanoma in the contemporary era remains poorly characterized. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent wide excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma 1 mm thick or thicker at a single institution were identified (2006–2019). The patients were stratified based on primary tumor TIL status as brisk (bTILs), non-brisk (nbTILs), or absent (aTILs). Associations between patient factors and outcomes were analyzed using multivariable analysis. Results Of the 1017 patients evaluated, 846 (83.2 %) had primary TILs [nbTILs ( n = 759, 89.7 %) and bTILs ( n = 87, 10.3 %)]. In the multivariable analysis, the patients with any type of TILs had higher rates of regression [odds ratio (OR), 1.86; p = 0.016], lower rates of acral lentiginous histology (OR, 0.22; p < 0.001), and lower rates of SLN positivity (OR, 0.64; p = 0.042) than those without TILs. The multivariable analysis found no association between disease-specific survival and bTILs [hazard ratio (HR), 1.04; p = 0.927] or nbTILs (HR, 0.89; p = 0.683). An association was found between bTILs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) advantage [bTILs (HR 0.46; p = 0.047), nbTILs (HR 0.71; p = 0.088)], with 5-year RFS rates of 84 % for bTILs, 71.8 % for nbTILs, and 68.4 % for aTILs ( p = 0.044). For the 114 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-naïve patients who experienced a recurrence treated with ICB therapy, no association was observed between progression-free survival and bTILs (HR, 0.64; p = 0.482) or nbTILs (HR, 0.58; p = 0.176). Conclusions The prognostic significance of primary TILs in the contemporary melanoma era appears complex. Further studies characterizing the phenotype of TILs and their association with regional metastasis and responsiveness to ICB therapy are warranted.