Invited Perspective: Diesel Exhaust and Lung Cancer-Delayed Findings Confirmed, but Consequences Continue.

Gregory R Wagner,David Michaels

Environmental health perspectives(2023)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Vol. 131, No. 8 Invited PerspectiveOpen AccessInvited Perspective: Diesel Exhaust and Lung Cancer—Delayed Findings Confirmed, but Consequences Continueis accompanied byDiesel Exhaust Exposure and Cause-Specific Mortality in the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study II (DEMS II) CohortThe Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) II: Temporal Factors Related to Diesel Exhaust Exposure and Lung Cancer Mortality in the Nested Case–Control Study Gregory R. Wagner and David Michaels Gregory R. Wagner Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Search for more papers by this author and David Michaels Address correspondence to David Michaels, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave. NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20052 USA. Telephone: (202) 994-1102. Email: E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-7733 Milken Institute School of Public Heath, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Search for more papers by this author Published:7 August 2023CID: 081301https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13258AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit The publication of new analyses of lung cancer risk from the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) is worth celebrating for many reasons. These analyses, known as DEMS II, extend follow-up of the original cohort by 18 y, adding 2,700 additional deaths to the cohort and 178 new lung cancer deaths to the case–control analysis.1,2 The finding of an elevated risk of lung cancer mortality observed in the first cohort study3 was confirmed in the updated analysis. Further, the study provides suggestive evidence that diesel exposure is associated with increased risk of death from non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as from diseases of the respiratory and cardiovascular system including ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease.1 The updated nested case–control analyses provide additional insight into the effect of the length and time of diesel exhaust exposure on lung cancer mortality risk, confirming the earlier study’s finding that risk increases with increased exposure, followed by a plateau or decline among the workers with the heaviest exposure.2,4First, it is worth celebrating that publication occurred without the drama, litigation, and political maneuvering that delayed, obstructed, and threatened to derail the original DEMS project altogether.5 This is in stark contrast to the 2012 DEMS capstone reports that were published despite overt threats of “consequences” from an industry lawyer representing U.S. mining concerns.6,7It is also a moment to recognize the outstanding work of excellent federal government career scientists employed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) who have, again, provided critically important documentation of the cancer and other health risks resulting from exposure to diesel exhaust.1,2 Their work will assist global public health authorities to address this risk more effectively in both workplaces and the general environment.The original DEMS publications were instrumental in moving the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to revise its 1988 categorization of diesel exhaust exposure from group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans, to group 1, a human carcinogen.8 This categorization has had substantial public health implications worldwide, stimulating and informing development of improved control technologies, fuel alternatives, public notification of risk, and public health regulatory efforts to reduce risk.In the 1970s the mining industry introduced diesel equipment into underground mines.9 The mixture of known carcinogens, particulate matter, and irritants in diesel exhaust concerned both NIOSH and mining regulators.10 NIOSH began research to assess the human health risk and recommended to the mining industry that the use of diesel technology in underground mining might have health implications and that “further introduction of diesel equipment into underground coal mines pending completion of these studies might result in future economic disruption should their use pose an unacceptable health risk.”11 Nonetheless, the adoption of diesel technology expanded greatly in both coal and other mining, construction, transportation, and eventually personal automobiles.In the mid-1980s, the legislatively mandated Federal Mine Health Research Advisory Committee established a diesel subcommittee to evaluate the risk to miners and recommend additional scientific investigations.5 By 1988, NIOSH had evaluated the occupational scientific literature on the health risk of diesel exhaust exposure and recommended that whole diesel exhaust be considered a human carcinogen.10Not long thereafter, NIOSH began exploring the feasibility of conducting a large cohort mortality study of miners and was later joined by researchers at the NCI to conduct a high-quality study designed to put to rest questions concerning diesel exhaust risk to miners. Although the government scientists conducted pilot studies to ensure that exposures could be estimated accurately and that sufficient personnel records were available, and despite two peer reviews of the original protocol, a coalition of mining companies waged a concerted campaign in courts and Congress to slow or stop the study, resulting in well over a decade of delay before the results of the original studies were published.5,12Industries whose operations would be adversely affected by stronger regulation protecting diesel-exposed workers also mounted a well-funded initiative to magnify and manufacture uncertainties in the original DEMS findings and the IARC reclassification. To accomplish this, corporations in the fossil fuel, mining, and engine manufacturing industries hired product defense consultants to conduct at least three literature reviews,13–15 three attempts to dispute the DEMS exposure estimates,16–18 and three post hoc reanalyses of the data.19–21 All of these predictably concluded there was too much uncertainty to definitively link diesel exhaust exposure with lung cancer.12Although these commissioned efforts were appropriately considered, the DEMS publications were further put under the microscope by a special scientific committee of the Health Effects Institute (HEI), an independent organization funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the motor vehicle industry. In 2015, the HEI review found no significant flaws in the DEMS work.22So, the current publication of the DEMS II work by Koutros et al. and Silverman et al. is another opportunity to celebrate the focus, grit, and constancy of purpose of this team of NIOSH and NCI investigators who did not let external machinations distract them from their goal: to produce scientifically valid results, then present these results accurately and clearly. But our celebration must be tempered by the consequences of the many delays and distractions. Epidemiological work that could have been accomplished in a few years took more than a decade, delaying the adoption of control technologies, exposing thousands or perhaps millions of workers worldwide and the general public to unnecessary hazardous exposures to diesel exhaust, likely contributing to the toll of preventable cancers for years to come. We hope these studies will stimulate a new look at strengthened protections from diesel exhaust exposure.References1. Koutros S, Graubard B, Bassig BA, Vermeulen R, Appel N, Hyer M, et al.2023. Diesel exhaust exposure and cause-specific mortality in the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study II (DEMS II) cohort. Environ Health Perspect 131(8):087003, 10.1289/EHP12840. Link, Google Scholar2. Silverman DT, Bassig BA, Lubin J, Graubard B, Blair A, Vermeulen R, et al.2023. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) II: temporal factors related to exposure and lung cancer mortality in the nested case–control study. Environ Health Perspect 131(8):087002, 10.1289/EHP11980. Link, Google Scholar3. Attfield MD, Schleiff PL, Lubin JH, Blair A, Stewart PA, Vermeulen R, et al.2012. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners study: a cohort mortality study with emphasis on lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(11):869–883, PMID: 22393207, 10.1093/jnci/djs035. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Silverman DT, Samanic CM, Lubin JH, Blair AE, Stewart PA, Vermeulen R, et al.2012. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners study: a nested case-control study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(11):855–868, PMID: 22393209, 10.1093/jnci/djs034. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Monforton C. 2006. Weight of the evidence or wait for the evidence? Protecting underground miners from diesel particulate matter. Am J Public Health 96(2):271–276, PMID: 16380560, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064410. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Kean S. 2012. Journals warned to keep a tight lid on diesel exposure data. Science Insider10.1126/article.27701. Crossref, Google Scholar7. Furlow B. 2012. Industry group “threatens” journals to delay publications. Lancet Oncol 13(4):337, PMID: 22577661, 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70094-3. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan RA, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al.2012. Carcinogenicity of diesel-engine and gasoline-engine exhausts and some nitroarenes. Lancet Oncol 13(7):663–664, PMID: 22946126, 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70280-2. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9. Mischler SE, Colinet JF.2009. Controlling and monitoring diesel emissions in underground mines in the United States. In: Mine Ventilation: Proceedings of the Ninth International Mine Ventilation Congress, New Delhi, India, 10–13 November 2009, vol. 2. Panigrahi DC, ed. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 879–888. Google Scholar10. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 1988. Carcinogenic Effects of Exposure to Diesel Exhaust. Current Intelligence Bulletin 50. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/88-116/ [accessed 17 July 2023]. Google Scholar11. NIOSH. Proceedings of a Workshop on the Use of Diesel Equipment in Underground Coal Mines. DHHS NIOSH Publication No. 82-122. https://books.google.com/books?id=I80qAAAAMAAJ [accessed 17 July 2023]. Google Scholar12. Michaels D. 2020. The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar13. Morfeld P. 2012. Diesel exhaust in miners study: how to understand the findings?J Occup Med Toxicol 7(1):10, PMID: 22676299, 10.1186/1745-6673-7-10. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14. Hesterberg TW, Long CM, Bunn WB, Lapin CA, McClellan RO, Valberg PA. 2012. Health effects research and regulation of diesel exhaust: an historical overview focused on lung cancer risk. Inhal Toxicol 24 Suppl 1(s1):1–45, PMID: 22663144, 10.3109/08958378.2012.691913. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15. Gamble JF, Nicolich MJ, Boffetta P. 2012. Lung cancer and diesel exhaust: an updated critical review of the occupational epidemiology literature. Crit Rev Toxicol 42(7):549––598, PMID: 22656672, 10.3109/10408444.2012.690725. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16. Borak J, Bunn WB, Chase GR, Hall TA, Head HJ, Hesterberg TW, et al.2011. Comments on the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study. Ann Occup Hyg 55(3):339–342, PMID: 21402871, 10.1093/annhyg/mer005. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17. Crump K, Van Landingham C. 2012. Evaluation of an exposure assessment used in epidemiological studies of diesel exhaust and lung cancer in underground mines. Crit Rev Toxicol 42(7):599–612, PMID: 22594934, 10.3109/10408444.2012.689755. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18. Crump KS, Van Landingham C, McClellan RO. 2016. Influence of alternative exposure estimates in the diesel exhaust miners study: diesel exhaust and lung cancer. Risk Anal 36(9):1803–1812, PMID: 26905315, 10.1111/risa.12556. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19. Crump KS, Van Landingham C, Moolgavkar SH, McClellan R. 2015. Reanalysis of the DEMS nested case-control study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust: suitability for quantitative risk assessment. Risk Anal 35(4):676–700, PMID: 25857246, 10.1111/risa.12371. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20. Moolgavkar SH, Chang ET, Luebeck G, Lau EC, Watson HN, Crump KS, et al.2015. Diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer mortality: time-related factors in exposure and risk. Risk Anal 35(4):663, PMID: 25683254, 10.1111/risa.12315. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21. Chang ET, Lau EC, Van Landingham C, Crump KS, McClellan RO, Moolgavkar SH. 2018. Reanalysis of diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer mortality in the diesel exhaust in miners study cohort using alternative exposure estimates and radon adjustment. Am J Epidemiol 187(6):1210–1219, PMID: 29522073, 10.1093/aje/kwy038. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22. HEI (Health Effects Institute) Diesel Epidemiology Panel. 2015. Diesel emissions and lung cancer: an evaluation of recent epidemiological evidence for quantitative risk assessment. Res Rep Health Eff Inst Spec No19(19):1–149, PMID: 26846065. https://www.healtheffects.org/publication/diesel-emissions-and-lung-cancer-evaluation-recent-epidemiological-evidence-quantitative [accessed 17 July 2023]. Medline, Google ScholarG.R.W. receives funding from the Alpha Foundation for the Improvement of Mine Safety and Health (AFCTG20-106). He and D.M. receive funding from the McElhattan Foundation. During some of the period discussed in this Perspective, G.R.W. held senior positions with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, and D.M. served as Assistant Secretary of Labor for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The views expressed in this Perspective are the authors’ and not those of the agencies for which they worked.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesDiesel Exhaust Exposure and Cause-Specific Mortality in the Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study II (DEMS II) Cohort7 August 2023Environmental Health PerspectivesThe Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) II: Temporal Factors Related to Diesel Exhaust Exposure and Lung Cancer Mortality in the Nested Case–Control Study7 August 2023Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 131, No. 8 August 2023Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Manuscript received2 May 2023Manuscript revised24 May 2023Manuscript accepted26 June 2023Originally published7 August 2023 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.
更多
查看译文
关键词
diesel exhaust,lung cancer—delayed
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要