Transfusion reactions associated with COVID-19 convalescent plasma in outpatient clinical trials.

Moises A Huaman,Jay S Raval, James H Paxton,Giselle S Mosnaim, Bela Patel,Shweta Anjan, Barry R Meisenberg,Adam C Levine, Christi E Marshall,Anusha Yarava, Aarthi G Shenoy,Sonya L Heath, Judith S Currier,Yuriko Fukuta,Janis E Blair, Emily S Spivak, Joann R Petrini,Patrick B Broderick, William Rausch,MarieElena Cordisco, Jean Hammel, Benjamin Greenblatt,Valerie C Cluzet, Daniel Cruser, Kevin Oei,Matthew Abinante,Laura L Hammitt,Catherine G Sutcliffe, Donald N Forthal,Martin S Zand, Edward R Cachay,Seble G Kassaye, Malathi Ram,Ying Wang, Piyali Das,Karen Lane, Nichol A McBee,Amy L Gawad, Nicky Karlen,Daniel E Ford, Oliver Laeyendecker,Andrew Pekosz, Sabra L Klein,Stephan Ehrhardt,Bryan Lau,Sheriza N Baksh, David M Shade,Arturo Casadevall, Daniel F Hanley,Jiangda Ou,Thomas J Gniadek, Alyssa Ziman,Shmuel Shoham, Kelly A Gebo,Evan M Bloch, Aaron A R Tobian,David J Sullivan,Jonathan M Gerber

Transfusion(2023)

引用 0|浏览28
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is an important therapeutic option for outpatients at high risk of hospitalization from SARS-CoV-2 infection. We assessed the safety of outpatient CCP transfusions administered during clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:We analyzed data pertaining to transfusion-related reactions from two randomized controlled trials in the U.S. that evaluated the efficacy of CCP versus control plasma in various ambulatory settings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess whether CCP was associated with transfusion reactions, after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS:The combined study reported 79/1351 (5.9%) adverse events during the transfusion visit, with the majority 62/1351 (4.6%) characterized by mild, allergic-type findings of urticaria, and/or pruritus consistent with minor allergic transfusion reactions; the other reported events were attributed to the patients' underlying disease, COVID-19, or vasovagal in nature. We found no difference in the likelihood of allergic transfusion reactions between those receiving CCP versus control plasma (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.43-1.31). Risk of urticaria and/or pruritus increased with a pre-existing diagnosis of asthma (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.16-4.67). We did not observe any CCP-attributed antibody disease enhancement in participants with COVID-19 or increased risk of infection. There were no life-threatening severe transfusion reactions and no patients required hospitalization related to transfusion-associated complications. DISCUSSION:Outpatient plasma administration was safely performed for nearly 1400 participants. CCP is a safe therapeutic option for outpatients at risk of hospitalization from COVID-19.
更多
查看译文
关键词
transfusion,clinical trials,<scp>covid</scp>‐19,plasma
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要