Lung-PNet: An Automated Deep Learning Model for the Diagnosis of Invasive Adenocarcinoma in Pure Ground-Glass Nodules on Chest CT

BACKGROUND. Pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) on chest CT representing invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) warrant lobectomy with lymph node resection. For pGGNs representing other entities, close follow-up or sublobar resection without node dissection may be appropriate. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an automated deep learning model for differentiation of pGGNs on chest CT representing IAC from those representing atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA). METHODS. This retrospective study included 402 patients (283 women, 119 men; mean age, 53.2 years) with a total of 448 pGGNs on noncontrast chest CT that were resected from January 2019 to June 2022 and were histologically diagnosed as AAH (n = 29), AIS (n = 83), MIA (n = 235), or IAC (n = 101). Lung-PNet, a 3D deep learning model, was developed for automatic segmentation and classification (probability of IAC vs other entities) of pGGNs on CT. Nodules resected from January 2019 to December 2021 were randomly allocated to training (n = 327) and internal test (n = 82) sets. Nodules resected from January 2022 to June 2022 formed a holdout test set (n = 39). Segmentation performance was assessed with Dice coefficients with radiologists' manual segmentations as reference. Classification performance was assessed by ROC AUC and precision-recall AUC (PR AUC) and compared with that of four readers (three radiologists, one surgeon). The code used is publicly available (https://github.com/XiaodongZhangPKUFH/Lung-PNet.git). RESULTS. In the holdout test set, Dice coefficients for segmentation of IACs and of other lesions were 0.860 and 0.838, and ROC AUC and PR AUC for classification as IAC were 0.911 and 0.842. At threshold probability of 50.0% or greater for prediction of IAC, Lung-PNet had sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score of 50.0%, 92.0%, 76.9%, and 60.9% in the holdout test set. In the holdout test set, accuracy and F1 score (p values vs Lung-PNet) for individual readers were as follows: reader 1, 51.3% ( p =.02) and 48.6% (p =.008); reader 2, 79.5% (p =.75) and 75.0% (p =.10); reader 3, 66.7% (p =.35) and 68.3% (p <.001); reader 4, 71.8% (p =.48) and 42.1% (p =.18). CONCLUSION. Lung-PNet had robust performance for segmenting and classifying (IAC vs other entities) pGGNs on chest CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. This automated deep learning tool may help guide selection of surgical strategies for pGGN management.