A dual-center validation of the PIRAMD scoring system for assessing the severity of ischemic Moyamoya disease

Background: Prior Infarcts, Reactivity, and Angiography in Moyamoya Disease (PIRAMD) is a recently proposed imaging-based scoring system that incorporates the severity of disease and its impact on parenchymal hemodynamics in order to better support clinical management and evaluate response to intervention. In particular, PIRAMD may have merit in identifying symptomatic patients that may benefit most from revascularization. Our aim was to validate the PIRAMD scoring system. Methods: Patients with ischemic Moyamoya disease, who underwent catheter angiographic [modified Suzuki Score (mSS) and collateralization status], morphological MRI and a parenchymal hemodynamic evaluation with blood oxygenation-level dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) at two transatlantic centers, were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the presence of neurological symptoms. The diagnostic capacity of each PIRAMD feature alone was evaluated, as well as combined and the inter-institutional differences of each parameter were evaluated. Results: Seventy-two hemispheres of 38 patients were considered for analysis, of which 39 (54%) were classified as symptomatic. The presence of a prior infarct had the highest odds ratio [odds ratio (OR) =24; 95% CI: 6.7-87.2] for having neurological symptoms, followed by impaired CVR (OR =17; 95% CI: 5-62). No inter-institutional differences in the odds ratios or area under the curve (AUC) were found for any study parameter. The PIRAMD score had an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96) with a similar AUC for the PIRAMD grading score. Conclusions: Our multicentric validation of the recently published PIRAMD scoring system was highly effective in rating the severity of ischemic Moyamoya disease with excellent inter-institutional agreement. Future studies should investigate the prognostic value of this novel imaging-based score in symptomatic patients with Moyamoya disease.