Observed consensus on research priorities for the hypertriglyceridemia patient registry

BackgroundPriority setting in health research has been described as essential due to disparities within and between countries and populations. Commercial benefits to the pharmaceutical industry may increase the generation and use of regulatory Real-World Evidence which has recently been reported in the literature. Research must be steered by valuable priorities. This study's objective is to identify key gaps in the knowledge of triglyceride-induced acute pancreatitis by generating a list of potential research priorities for a Hypertriglyceridemia Patient Registry.MethodThe Jandhyala Method was used to observe the consensus of expert opinion from ten specialist clinicians in the treatment of triglyceride-induced acute pancreatitis across the US and EU.ResultsTen participants completed the consensus round of the Jandhyala method and generated 38 unique items which they all agreed with. The items were included in the generation of research priorities for a hypertriglyceridemia patient registry and presented a novel application of the Jandhyala method for the development of research questions, in aid of the validation of a core dataset.ConclusionThe TG-IAP core dataset and research priorities combined can develop a globally harmonized framework where TG-IAP patients can be observed simultaneously using the same set of indicators. This will increase knowledge of the disease and facilitate higher-quality research by addressing issues related to incomplete data sets in observational studies. Furthermore, validation of new tools will be enabled, and diagnosis and monitoring will be improved as well as the detection of changes in disease severity and subsequent disease progression, improving the management of patients with TG-IAP overall. This will inform personalized patient management plans and improve patient outcomes along with their quality of life. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYThe differences in healthcare between countries and groups of people will likely affect the type of research needed. This is why people that have experience with specific diseases need to be spoken to, to understand what their concerns are. These types of people could be doctors or patients. When this information is gathered, this could help inform organizations interested in a specific disease on how to help patients in real life situations.For this study, the researchers worked with ten expert doctors who treat a disease called triglyceride-induced acute pancreatitis (TG-IAP). These doctors were from the United States and the European Union, and they were asked to share their opinions on what the most important research areas are using the Jandhyala method. The doctors generated and agreed on 38 items, all related to the most important research areas for TG-IAP.The research areas identified can be used with important data collected about patients with TG-IAP to create a study where these patients are monitored in different locations using the same measurements. This study will help people learn more about the disease and improve the quality of research by making sure the most important data is collected. As a result, patients with TG-IAP can have their healthcare improved.