Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Final 3-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing a Self-Expanding to a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Jonas Lanz, Helge Moellmann, Won-Keun Kim, Christof Burgdorf, Axel Linke, Simon Redwood, Michael Hilker, Michael Joner, Holger Thiele, Lars Conzelmann, Lenard Conradi, Sebastian Kerber, Christian Thilo, Stefan Toggweiler, Bernard Prendergast, Oliver Husser, Stefan Stortecky, Sarah Deckarm, Arnaud Kuenzi, Dik Heg, Thomas Walther, Stephan Windecker, Thomas Pilgrim

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions(2023)

Cited 1|Views37
No score
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the SCOPE I trial (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis), transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo (NEO) did not meet noninferiority compared with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) device regarding a composite end point at 30 days due to higher rates of prosthetic valve regurgitation and acute kidney injury. Data on long-term durability of NEO are scarce. Here, we report whether early differences between NEO and S3 translate into differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with NEO or S3 at 20 European centers. Clinical outcomes at 3 years are compared using Cox proportional or Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models by intention-to-treat. Bioprosthetic valve failure is reported for the valve-implant cohort. RESULTS: Among 739 patients, 84 of 372 patients (24.3%) had died in the NEO and 85 of 367 ( 25%) in the S3 group at 3 years. Comparing NEO with S3, the 3- year rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73- 1.33]), stroke (subhazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.56- 1.92]), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure ( subhazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.51-1.07]) were similar between the groups. Aortic valve reinterventions were required in 4 NEO and 3 S3 patients (subhazard ratio, 1.32 [ 95% CI, 0.30- 5.85]). New York Heart Association functional class <= II was observed in 84% (NEO) and 85% (S3), respectively. Mean gradients remained lower after NEO at 3 years (8 versus 12 mm Hg; P<0.001).' CONCLUSIONS: Early differences between NEO and S3 did not translate into significant differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure throughout 3 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03011346.
More
Translated text
Key words
bioprosthesis,randomized trial,TAVI,TAVR,transcatheter heart valves
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined