Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy.

The finite element model is much slower, but it's more accurate compared to the machine learning model since it's based on physical laws guiding the hypertrophy process. On the other hand, the machine learning model is fast but the results can be less trustworthy in some cases. Both of our models, enable us to monitor the development of the disease. Because of its speed machine learning model is more likely to be used in clinical practice. Further improvements to our machine learning model could be achieved by collecting data from finite element simulations, adding them to the dataset, and retraining the model. This can result in a fast and more accurate model combining the advantages of physical-based and machine learning modeling.