Caution: shortcomings of traditional segmentation methods from magnetic resonance imaging brain scans intended for 3-dimensional surface modelling in children with pathology

This technical innovation assesses the adaptability of some common automated segmentation tools on abnormal pediatric magnetic resonance (MR) brain scans. We categorized 35 MR scans by pathologic features: (1) “normal”; (2) “atrophy”; (3) “cavity”; (4) “other.” The following three tools, (1) Computational Anatomy Toolbox version 12 (CAT12); (2) Statistical Parametic Mapping version 12 (SPM12); and (3) MRTool, were tested on each scan—with default and adjusted settings. Success was determined by radiologist consensus on the surface accuracy. Automated segmentation failed in scans demonstrating severe surface brain pathology. Segmentation of the “cavity” group was ineffective, with success rates of 23.1% (CAT12), 69.2% (SPM12) and 46.2% (MRTool), even with refined settings and manual edits. Further investigation is required to improve this workflow and automated segmentation methodology for complex surface pathology.