University students’ opinion on gamete donor identification regimes

Ana Nogueira, Omar Ammar, Enes Bilir, Lavinia Iftene, Ignácio Torrero, Nathan Ceschin,Cristina Nogueira-Silva,Pedro Brandão

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the opinion of university students about the identification or nonidentification of gamete donation and the probability of donation according to the different regimes. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study based on an online anonymous survey including questions about sociodemographic data, reasons for considering donations, information about the donation process and legislation, and their opinions about the different regimes and how they would influence donations. Results In total, 1393 valid responses were obtained, with a mean age of 24.0 years (SD = 4.8), most of the respondents being female (68.5%), living in a relationship (56.7%), and without children (88.4%). The main reasons for considering donation would be altruism and monetary compensation. Overall, it was found that participants were poorly informed about the donation procedure and legislation. Students revealed preference for nonidentified donation, and they were less likely to donate in an open identity regime. Conclusion Most university students consider themselves poorly informed about gamete donation, express a preference for nonidentified gamete donation, and would less likely donate on an open identity basis. Thus, an identified regime may be less attractive to potential donors and lead to a decrease in the availability of gamete donors.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Anonymity,Fertility,Oocyte donation,Reproduction,Reproductive techniques,Sperm donation
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要