Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, May/June 2023.

Journal of Midwifery & Women's HealthVolume 68, Issue 3 p. 395-403 Recent Publications Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, May/June 2023 Mary K. Barger CNM, PhD, MPH, Mary K. Barger CNM, PhD, MPH Midwifery researcher and consultant, San Diego, CaliforniaSearch for more papers by this authorAbby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD, Abby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaSearch for more papers by this authorNena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE, Nena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE Family Nursing, Frontier Nursing University, Fort Mill, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author Mary K. Barger CNM, PhD, MPH, Mary K. Barger CNM, PhD, MPH Midwifery researcher and consultant, San Diego, CaliforniaSearch for more papers by this authorAbby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD, Abby Howe-Heyman CNM, PhD School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaSearch for more papers by this authorNena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE, Nena R. Harris CNM, PhD, FNP-BC, CNE Family Nursing, Frontier Nursing University, Fort Mill, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 May 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13507Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1Burger EA, de Kok I, Groene E, et al. Estimating the natural history of cervical carcinogenesis using simulation models: a CISNET comparative analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020; 112(9): 955-963. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz227 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer statistics. 2022. Accessed February 29, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/index.htm 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer is preventable. Vital Signs. November 2014; updated March 16, 2020. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/cervical-cancer/index.html 4Suran M. Why US cervical cancer survival rates haven't improved for decades. JAMA. 2022; 327(20): 1943-1945. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4681 5Francoeur AA, Liao CI, Caesar MA, et al. The increasing incidence of stage IV cervical cancer in the USA: what factors are related? [published online August 18, 2022]. Int J Gynecol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-003728 6Suk R, Hong YR, Rajan SS, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Spencer JC. Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline—concordant cervical cancer screening rates and reasons for underscreening by age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, rurality, and insurance, 2005 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(1):e2143582. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43582 7Fedewa SA, Star J, Bandi P, et al. Changes in cancer screening in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(6):e2215490. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15490 8Di Gennaro G, Licata F, Trovato A, Bianco A. Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1003461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003461 9Arbyn M, Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wentzensen N, Heckman-Stoddard B, Sahasrabuddhe VV. Meta-analysis of agreement/concordance statistics in studies comparing self- vs clinician-collected samples for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2022; 151(2): 308-312. 10Pingali C, Yankey D, Elam-Evans LD, et al. National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years — United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021; 70(35): 1183-1190. 11Camus C, Penaranda G, Khiri H, et al. Acceptability and efficacy of vaginal self-sampling for genital infection and bacterial vaginosis: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0260021. 12 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA's Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. Vol HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2014. References 1 ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice; American Academy of Pediatrics. ACOG committee opinion no. 594: Immersion in water during labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(4): 912-915. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Aog.0000445585.52522.14 2 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American College of Obstetricians Committee on Obstetric Practice. Immersion in water during labor and delivery. Pediatrics. 2014; 133(4): 758-761. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3794 3Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A, Anderson CM, Chipps E. Outcomes of waterbirth in a US hospital-based midwifery practice: a retrospective cohort study of water immersion during labor and birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020; 65(2): 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13033 4Aughey H, Jardine J, Moitt N, et al. Waterbirth: a national retrospective cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03724-6 5Bailey JM, Zielinski RE, Emeis CL, Kane Low L. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2020; 47(1): 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12473 6Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5(5):CD000111. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4 7Water birth? Don't do it. Adv Neonatal Care. 2014; 14(3): 139. https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0000000000000098 8Allen J, Gao Y, Dahlen H, et al. Is a randomized controlled trial of waterbirth possible? An Australian feasibility study. Birth. 2022; 49(4): 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12635 9 WHO Immediate KMC Study Group; Arya S, Naburi H, Kawaza K, et al. Immediate “kangaroo mother care” and survival of infants with low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(21): 2028-2038. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2026486 10Bovbjerg ML. Opposition to waterbirth is not evidence based. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30(5): 625-627. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8790 References 1Poon LC, Nguyen HL, Smith GN, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term cardiovascular health: FIGO best practice advice. Int J Gynecol Obst. 2023; 160(suppl 1): 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14540 2Abheiden CNH, van Doornik R, Aukes AM, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy appear not to be associated with Alzheimer's disease later in life. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2015; 5(3): 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439043 3Brown MC, Best KE, Pearce MS, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013; 28(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9762-6 4Mielke MM, Milic NM, Weissgerber TL, et al. Impaired cognition and brain atrophy decades after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016; 9(2 suppl 1): S70-S76. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002461 5Switzer A, Smith EE, Ganesh A. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are associated with future development of vascular dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2021; 48(suppl 3): S24. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2021.298 6Andolf EG, Sydsjö GCM, Bladh MK, Berg G, Sharma S. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and later dementia: a Swedish National Register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96(4): 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13096 7Basit S, Wohlfahrt J, Boyd HA. Pre-eclampsia and risk of dementia later in life: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2018; 363:k4109. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4109 8Nelander M, Cnattingius S, Akerud H, Wikström J, Pedersen NL, Wikström AK. Pregnancy hypertensive disease and risk of dementia and cardiovascular disease in women aged 65 years or older: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1):e009880. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009880 9Chen C, Zissimopoulos JM. Racial and ethnic differences in trends in dementia prevalence and risk factors in the United States. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018; 4: 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.009 10Lee M, Whitsel E, Avery C, et al. Variation in population attributable fraction of dementia associated with potentially modifiable risk factors by race and ethnicity in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(7):e2219672. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19672 11Slomski A. Obesity is now the top modifiable dementia risk factor in the US. JAMA. 2022; 328(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.11058 12Maki PM, Jaff NG. Brain fog in menopause: a health-care professional's guide for decision-making and counseling on cognition. Climacteric. 2022; 25(6): 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2022.2122792 Volume68, Issue3May/June 2023Pages 395-403 ACNM Members ACNM Members: Click here to log in ReferencesRelatedInformation